A write-in candidate is one in an election whose name does not
appear on the ballot but for whom voters may vote nonetheless by writing in the
person's name on election day.
Some US States allow voters to paste a sticker with the name of a
candidate they perceived should have been given the opportunity to contest the
election. Write-in candidates rarely win, and votes are often cast for
ineligible people or even fictional characters. Franklin D. Roosevelt, Dwight
Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy are counted among those who have won by write-in
votes.
Write-in candidates have also been elected in Sweden, Brazil and
Ecuador among other countries.
In recent times, we have seen ‘in-fighting’ within Jamaican
political parties as incumbents feel threaten by a challenge, especially if the
incumbent was thrown into the constituency for the sake of winning a seat and/ fails
to perform. We have seen the preference of the Jamaican people to be
represented by ‘one of their own’, someone they trust and have a rapport with
either through family and committed community advocate and leadership. The main
political has largely ignored the plight of the people, and instead stimulate
loyalist thinking – one size, fit all.
The People's Representative
Currently the political scuffle within the JLP between MP Gregory
Mair and Sharon-Hay Webster, which sees establishment seat filler against
constituency native and people’s likely preference. The initial statements
suggest the fear of Mair ‘losing power’ – such thinking continues to hamper our
governance and democratic development as the ability to perform and represent
is linked with being “in power” which is also a constitution reform issue that
should give greater role and muscle to government opposition and the people.
The Jamaican electoral system should consider if not actual law,
but absorb the spirit of write-in and encourage independent candidates. As I
believe that political representatives put forward as the people's
representative of whichever political party should have years of hard work on
the ground, should be familiar with the development plans and can understand
the needs of the constituency better than any new-comer politician.
This could stir more participation within the democratic process –
allowing people to suggest a preferred choice creates some level of trust and
satisfaction.
No comments:
Post a Comment